The Obelisk Forum
http://forum.theobelisk.net/

F.A.Q. Thread
http://forum.theobelisk.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4750
Page 5 of 7

Author:  dutch gus [ Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

poisin ivy wrote:
I'd soo smoke y'all out with some of this new hash I got. Great stuff !!!! I'm starting to believe hashish is a much better high than regular weed. :)


There's terrible stuff out there, but decent solids are certainly better than decent herbal.

IMO.

Author:  h.p. taskmaster [ Sun Mar 10, 2013 8:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

Updated.

Author:  Stickman [ Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

dutch gus wrote:
poisin ivy wrote:
I'd soo smoke y'all out with some of this new hash I got. Great stuff !!!! I'm starting to believe hashish is a much better high than regular weed. :)


There's terrible stuff out there, but decent solids are certainly better than decent herbal.

IMO.


Lemon Haze bud at 34% THC at my local candyshop, 32% Tahoe OG, lab tested for THCs, CBDs and CBNs and pesticides. Solids involve butane and other hydrocarbon extractors far too often, except bubbler hash and some other hash & oil techs, plus over 50% THC starts re-setting your tolerance levels too high to function if you're a regular toker. Give me properly cured bud anytime.
https://legalmarijuanadispensary.com/di ... annaclinic

Author:  poisin ivy [ Sat Apr 27, 2013 8:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

Stickman wrote:
dutch gus wrote:
poisin ivy wrote:
I'd soo smoke y'all out with some of this new hash I got. Great stuff !!!! I'm starting to believe hashish is a much better high than regular weed. :)


There's terrible stuff out there, but decent solids are certainly better than decent herbal.

IMO.


Lemon Haze bud at 34% THC at my local candyshop, 32% Tahoe OG, lab tested for THCs, CBDs and CBNs and pesticides. Solids involve butane and other hydrocarbon extractors far too often, except bubbler hash and some other hash & oil techs, plus over 50% THC starts re-setting your tolerance levels too high to function if you're a regular toker. Give me properly cured bud anytime.
https://legalmarijuanadispensary.com/di ... annaclinic


Finished the hash a longtime ago. Been smoking alot of good buds lately.. Don't think I've ever smoked this much before and all for free! Started the year with a gift, a garbage bag full of leftovers from a pot club my friend works at. I've been going through at least an ounce a week lol. I've actually rolled joints similar to the ones in Up in Smoke and domed it to the head lol. Still have the roach collection to deplete and that will take awhile too.

Author:  RacerX [ Tue May 21, 2013 3:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

wtf are you talking about? I thought you were a gay pedophile—now yer into NUNS?

gtfo.

Author:  slevin [ Tue May 21, 2013 4:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

Dom's post removed for being extremely off topic. I mean, I like boobs, but that dude is just weird.

Author:  Crutch [ Wed May 22, 2013 6:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

Image

Author:  RacerX [ Fri May 24, 2013 3:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

Last edited by doom dom on Wed May 22, 2013 8:55 pm, edited 14 times in total.

14 edits? And all for your post to be deleted again, alas.

Author:  Arzgarth [ Fri May 24, 2013 5:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

Pretty much

Author:  h.p. taskmaster [ Wed May 29, 2013 9:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

It was creepy and weird, I don't know if it was delete-worthy.

Author:  slevin [ Thu May 30, 2013 8:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

Maybe not on its own, but in the context of a FAQ thread, I found it to be a bit much.

The power is clearly getting to my head.

Author:  h.p. taskmaster [ Thu May 30, 2013 9:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

slevin wrote:
The power is clearly getting to my head.


Image

Author:  slevin [ Fri May 31, 2013 12:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

Mein Fuhrer, I can walk!

Author:  Bongzilla [ Fri May 31, 2013 4:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

That guy is a net-wide known creep. We ("the other board") finally banhammered the guy after posting links to sites where the girls appeared quite clearly to be, well, girls. He did his usual "well when do they become women at exactly 18 yrs old cuntbutts panties..." spiel but that was it : Later days jack(offer)

Author:  h.p. taskmaster [ Mon Jun 03, 2013 10:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

Yeah, I heard he got banned over there, and I'm not saying he wouldn't get the same treatment here, he just hasn't gone that far as of this point. He's the creepiest of the creepy, but until he does something like that here, it doesn't seem right to shitcan him on account of past transgressions.

Author:  Arzgarth [ Mon Jun 03, 2013 12:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

Yes it does. USA! USA! USA!

Author:  slevin [ Sun Jun 09, 2013 11:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

So the NSA has all this information and no one has knocked on his door?

Author:  Bongzilla [ Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

Nah, the 34 edits threw 'em off

Author:  h.p. taskmaster [ Tue Jun 11, 2013 1:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

We wouldn't want the government thinking this board is too uptight.

Author:  slevin [ Thu Jul 04, 2013 2:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

@h.p. taskmaster Hot dog.

Author:  dong ytown [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

Jötun wrote:
The message you got sounds more like a time-out than a perma-ban.

They should ban joyce instead.



redoux. only been 15 months? little do they know that board hasn't mattered to me in over 8 years. almost 9. what do you got?

Author:  tastelikedirt [ Fri Nov 15, 2013 9:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

DUNK!

Author:  dong ytown [ Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

so the 5 days after I got banned, 9 cyclists in London were killed, none of them racer. then that body in florida fell out of a plane, reminded me of canfield cop that sprained my wrist and how his chute didn't open. justice.

that site over there, none of them play, tag-alongs since day 1. they never stood on their own feet. sick of babysitting. eh, don't care.

it's not all day now, I can get things done now.

Author:  dong ytown [ Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

the child running that site over there just banned my dizzy d screen name, resetting my computer today it had reset my cookies, so I logged in with a new name.

they'll try to act like they're about anything other than sucking each other's cocks over there, they have no purpose, I never participated in years to a single discussion but just used them for my own enjoyment that didn't have anything to do with any of them really, and there's an entire internet.

Author:  Jor el [ Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: F.A.Q. Thread

You don't need Them

Page 5 of 7 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/