| The Obelisk Forum http://forum.theobelisk.net/ |
|
| REviews vs. classic reviews http://forum.theobelisk.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=198 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | omind [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | REviews vs. classic reviews |
Whats the deviding line? Date of issue? For classics is there a quality issue? It's labor intensive but I think I'm gonna follow up on the "beaster" review style and do'm track by track with stuff thats in the 9-10 range. I did one for "not fragile" which I broke out "Popoff" style- rating heaviness and quality separately. It was an important review and revitalized their career. As far as classics go how many "meh" tracks can a tape have? How much of classicism is linked to the time and place and how much is eternal? How "important" can something be and still have flaws? Can I have a beer yet ? |
|
| Author: | Arzgarth [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: REviews vs. classic reviews |
Reviews – current releases and/or releases directly related to the genre Class reviews – greats from the 60s, 70s, 80s, along with cornerstone albums. I suppose this forum has more capabilities from moving a thread from one forum to the next. |
|
| Author: | Jötun [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: REviews vs. classic reviews |
I would've placed Winter 'Into Darkness' in classic reviews due to its age, but that's just me. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|